Sh v r 2012 nswcca 79

Author: yyig

August undefined, 2024

WebNational Commercial Banking Corporation of Australia Limited v Hedley (1984) NSW ConvR 55-211; Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538; Suggest a case What people say about Law … WebSpecial Bulletin 28 — King v The Queen [2012] HCA 24. Special Bulletin 29 — Burns v The Queen [2012] HCA 35. Special Bulletin 30 — Norman v R [2012] NSWCCA 230 and SKA v R …

Sh v R [2012] NSWCCA 79 Student Law Notes - Online Case …

WebSH v R (2012) 83 NSWLR 258; [2012] NSWCCA 79 Sexual assault of child under 10. Complainant was main witness. Gave unsworn evidence. Appeal on basis of lack of … WebNSWCCA 335 per Howie J at [37]; but contrast Shajeel Khanwaiz v R [2012] NSWCCA 168 at [96] which is discussed below at [123]. Plea agreements 18. In GAS v The Queen (2004) 217 CLR 198 at [27]–[32], the High Court said that plea agreements are affected by five fundamental principles:2 1. literature project cover page ideas

Competence and Compellability of Witnesses NSW Courts

WebJan 8, 2024 · In the case of SH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79, the defendant appealed against his conviction for having sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 10 years. The basis … WebCollier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 , , , Colomer v R [2014] NSWCCA 51 [ 11-145 ] Commissioner of Taxation v Baffsky (2001) 122 A Crim R 568 [ 16-020 ] WebR v Purdon [1996] NSWCCA 60659 (Unreported, Hunt CJ at CL, McInerney and Donovan AJ, 27 March 1997) Deterrence Custodial Sentence: R v Qin [2008] NSWCCA 189: Federal Offenders Liable for Deportation: R v Quinn [2012] SASCFC 102: Physical Condition: R v R L P [2009] VSCA 271: Age: R v Rakiba [2014] ACTSC 373: Deterrence: R v Reiner (1974) 8 … literature pschoanalytical lens

Table of cases - Judicial Commission of New South Wales

FACT FINDING ON SENTENCE

http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNDAULawRw/2013/4.pdf WebR v Ly [2014] NSWCCA 78 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381, (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Moussad [1999] NSWCCA 337; (1999) 152 FLR 373 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; (2015) 90 ALJR 13 Redfern v R [2012] NSWCCA 178; (2012) 228 A Crim R 56 Savvas v The Queen [1995] HCA 29; (1995) 183 CLR 1 Schembri v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 149; (2010) 78 … literature psychology phd programsWeb2 R v Horton-Hegarty [2024] ACTCA 22 R v Meyboom [2012] ACTCA 48 R v Minnis (unreported, Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, Higgins CJ, 4 May 2009 ) R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272; 164 A Crim R 481 R v Mumberson [2011] NSWCCA 54 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v SAG [2004] QCA 286 ; 147 A Crim R 301 R v Toumo’ua … literature projects for college students

"WebIt is not concerned with whether that direction is understood or even acknowledged (R v Muller (2013) 7 ACTLR 296; [2013] ACTCA 15 at [41] per Dowsett J (Penfold J and Nield … " - Sh v r 2012 nswcca 79

Sh v r 2012 nswcca 79

SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Webwhose reasons Beazley JA and Harrison J agreed) in Bolt v R [2012] NSWCCA 50 at [35]- ... NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168, R v McEvoy[2010] NSWCCA 110 and R v Knight [2007] … Webthe witness to give evidence. These matters were made clear by the NSWCCA in SH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79; 83 NSWLR 258; 222 A Crim R 43 at [7]-[8] where Basten JA stated: “[7] Section 13 was amended by the Evidence Amendment Act 2007 (NSW) ("the 2007 Amendment Act"), which commenced operation on 1 January 2009.

Did you know?

WebFeb 13, 2024 · ODPP Annual Report 2001-2002. ODPP Annual Report 2000-2001. ODPP Annual Report 1999-2000. Witness Assistance Service. Aboriginal Witness Assistance Service officers. Appeals to the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. Supporting victims and witnesses at court. WAS overview in Arabic. WAS overview in Italian. WebApr 24, 2015 · In The Queen v GW [2016] HCA 6 delivered today (2 Mar 2016), the High Court has unanimously allowed an appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutions for the ACT (the DPP) from [2015] ACTCA 15, decided on 24 April 2015, a decision of the ACT Court of Appeal. The High Court has found that the Uniform Evidence Legislation (the UEL) is …

WebIn Wood v R, the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal demolished the prosecution case and attacked the ... [2012] NSWCCA 21 (24 February 2012). 9 (2012) 290 ALR 189; [2012] HCA 29. (2013) 15 undaLr 58 II grounds for stoppIng a trIaL The leading case as to the circumstances under which a trial judge may WebSH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79 . Facts -A child was to give unsworn evidence in a criminal trial Issue -Does the Court have discretion to refuse to allow a child to give unsworn evidence? …

WebGuilty plea in the Local Court to Drive Manner Dangerous Cause GBH – facts disputed in DC, victim gave evidence and Judge preferred that evidence to the offender’s.“The utilitarian … WebCourt tells witness those things set out in s 13(5)(a)-(c) in full – SH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79. Also, see A2 v R; Magennis v R; Vaziri v R [2024] NSWCCA 174 – competence assessed at the time of adducing evidence at trial not in retrospect (such as the time of recording the initial investigative interview for a ‘vulnerable’ witness) Issues ...

WebBefore commencement of the second trial the prosecutor told the Court that the from LPAB 02 at The University of Sydney

WebSH v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 79 29 The Queen v GW [2016] HCA 6 29 30 Interpreters 30 31 Deaf and mute witnesses 30 R v Gulam Mohammad Khan (1995 unreported NSWSC) … import duty rate in kenyaWebSH v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 79 “This ambiguity is to be resolved in favour of the conclusion that there is no discretionary power to refuse to allow a child to give unsworn evidence, if the court is satisfied as to the capacity to understand a question and give a comprehensible answer, in accordance with sub-s (1).“ literature project topicsWebApr 28, 2024 · In resentencing the Applicant, this Court should apply s.16A(2)(g) in its present form which gives effect to aspects of the utilitarian value of a guilty plea as described in Xiao v R and Bae v R. The Applicant’s guilty pleas for the Commonwealth offences were entered at an early stage of the proceeding when still before the Local Court. import duty taxes \u0026 customs clearanceWebSwan v. The Queen Case No. S291/2024. Case Information. Lower Court Judgment. 23/11/2024 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Bathurst CJ, … literature published in 1922WebFrom there, the provision as a whole is expressed in obligatory terms and compliance requires a sequential mode of reasoning explained in RJ v R at [14]–[23] and MK v R … import duty rate malaysiaWeb2 Fusimalohi v The Queen [2012] ACTCA 49 Gore v R; Hunter v R [2010] NSWCCA 330; 208 A Crim R 353 Hampton v R [2010] NSWCCA 278; 208 A Crim R 478 Henry v The Queen [2024] ACTCA 5 Higgins v The Queen [2024] ACTCA 26 Hili v the Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Imbornone v R [2024] NSWCCA 144 Kite v R [2009] NSWCCA 12 Markarian v The … import duty to eu from ukWebSH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79 . Competence — failure of court to comply with s 13(5) Evidence Act 1995 In SH v R, the trial court failed to comply with the competence provisions in the … import duty structure in india